Volume 1 | Number 2 | Online Early Version
Online Version: ISSN No: 0270-9058
Print Version: ISSN No: 2708-2490
Price: BDT: 750.00, USD: 25.00.00
Publish Date: 01, January 2021
Ahmad, A. (2014). Bangladesh in 2013: Year of confusions,
confrontations, concerns, Asian Survey, 54(1): 190-198.
Akkoyunlu, F.K. (2014). The rise and fall of the hybrid regime:
Guardianship and democracy in Iran and Turkey. Phd Thesis. The
London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
Akyuz, K. & Hess, S. (2018). Turkey looks East, Mediterranean
Quarterly, 29(2): 1-26.
Anam, T. (2013). Shahbag protesters versus the butcher of Mirpur, The
Guardian, 13 February. https://www.theguardian.com/
Awami League (2009). The Constitution of Bangladesh Awami League,
15 March. http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-367.html.
BBC News (2018). How a traffic accident stopped a city of 18 million,
BBC News, 6 August. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia45080129.
Bergman, D. (2016). The politics of Bangladesh's genocide debate, The
New York Times, 5 April. https://www.nytimes.com/
Bhardwaj, S.K. (2011). Contesting identities in Bangladesh: A study of
secular and religious frontiers. Asia Research Center, London
School of Economics and Political Science. http://www.lse.ac.uk/
Bogaards, M. (2009). How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective
democracy and electoral authoritarianism, Democratization, 16(2):
Burke, J. (2014). Bangladesh elections: Tensions high in face of
opposition boycott, The Guardian, 3 January.
Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm, Journal of
Democracy, 13(1): 5-21.
Chowdhury, N. (2019). Paradoxes of the Popular: Crowd Politics in
Bangladesh. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Chowdhury, S.T. (2015). Bangladesh students protest education tax, Al
Jazeera News 13 September. https://www.aljazeera.com/
Desrues, T. (2013). Mobilizations in a hybrid regime: the 20th
February movement and the Moroccan regime, Current Sociology,
Diamond, L.J. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes, Journal of
Democracy, 13(2): 21-35.
Dogan, M. (1992). Conceptions of legitimacy. In M. Dogan & M.
Hawkesworth (eds.), Encyclopedia of Government and Politics.
Vol. 1. London: Routledge, pp. 116-126.
Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York, NY:
Economic Intelligence Unit (2020). Democracy Index 2019: A Year of
Democratic Setbacks and Popular Protest. London: Economic
Intelligence Unit. https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_
Ekman, J. (2009). Political participation and regime stability: A
framework for analyzing hybrid regimes, International Political
Science Review, 30(1): 7-31.
Epstein, D.L., Bates, R., Goldstone, J., Kristensen, I. & O'Halloran, S.
(2006). Democratic transitions, American Journal of Political
Science, 50(3): 551-569.
Fair, C.C. (2019). Bangladesh in 2018: Careening toward one-woman
rule, Asian Survey, 59(1): 124-132.
Feldman, S. (2015). Bangladesh in 2014: Illusive democracy, Asian
Survey, 55(1): 67-74.
Freedom on the Net: Bangladesh. (2019). [Annual]. Freedom House.
Fu, D. (2018). Mobilizing without the Masses: Control and Contention
in China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fukuyama, F. (2006). The End of History and the Last Man. pbk. ed.
New York: Free Press.
Gerschewski, J. (2013). The three pillars of stability: Legitimation,
repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes, Democratization,
Gilley, B. (2009). The Right to Rule: How States Win and Lose
Legitimacy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hale, H.E. (2010). Eurasian polities as hybrid regimes: The case of
Putin's Russia, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1(1): 33-41.
Hale, H.E. (2011). Hybrid regimes. In N. Brown (ed.), The Dynamics of
Democratization: Dictatorship, Development, and Diffusion.
Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 23-45.
Harrison, F. (2017). Political Islam and the elections in Bangladesh.
Institute of Commonwealth Studies. 5 January.
Hasina, S. (2019). Bangladesh is booming and here's why — PM Sheikh
Hasina explains, The Print (blog). 4 October.
Hassan, T. & Hunter, K. (2013). Blood on the Streets: The Use of
Excessive Force during Bangladesh Protests. New York: Human
Jayasuriya, K. & Rodan, G. (2007). Beyond hybrid regimes: More
participation, less contestation in Southeast Asia, Democratization,
Khalid, S. & Sarker, S. (2018). Ten years of Sheikh Hasina:
Development minus democracy, Al Jazeera News. 28 December.
Lerner, A.M. (2019). The co-optation of dissent in hybrid states: PostSoviet Graffiti in Moscow, Comparative Political Studies, October,
Levitsky, S. & Way, L. (2002). The rise of competitive
authoritarianism, Journal of Democracy, 13(2): 51-65.
Lipset, S.M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic
development and political legitimacy, American Political Science
Review, 53(1): 69-105.
Mahmud, F. (2019). Bangladesh student killing: Thousands protest
demanding justice, Al Jazeera News, 7 October
Manik, J.A. & Abi-Habib, M. (2018). Students pour into Dhaka’s
streets to demand safer roads, The New York Times, 5 August.
Marquez, X. (2016). The irrelevance of legitimacy, Political Studies,
Mazepus, H. (2017). What makes political authorities legitimate?
Students’ ideas about legitimacy in five European democracies and
hybrid regimes, Contemporary Politics, 23(3): 306–327.
Mazepus, H., Veenendaal, W., McCarthy-Jones, A. & Vásquez, J.M.T.
(2016). A comparative study of legitimation strategies in hybrid
regimes, Policy Studies, 37(4): 350-369.
Menocal, A.R., Fritz, V. & Rakner, L. (2008). Hybrid regimes and the
challenges of deepening and sustaining democracy in developing
countries, South African Journal of International Affairs, 15(1):
Merkel, W. (2004). Embedded and defective democracies,
Democratization, 11(5): 33-58.
Moniruzzaman (2019). Electoral legitimacy, preventive representation,
and regularization of authoritarian democracy in Bangladesh,
Elections - A Global Perspective, February.
Morlino, L. (2009). Are there hybrid regimes? Or are they just an
optical illusion? European Political Science Review, 1(2): 273-96.
Morse, Y.L. (2012). The era of electoral authoritarianism, World
Politics, 64(1): 161-198.
Murshid, N. (2016). The genocide of 1971 and the politics of justice. In
A. Riaz & M.S. Rahman (eds.), Routledge Handbook of
Contemporary Bangladesh. London & New York: Routledge/Taylor
& Francis Group, pp. 52-61.
New Age (2019). 29,315 killed, 69,428 injured in road crashes in 4 yrs:
Report, New Age, 21 October. https://www.newagebd.net/
New Age (2020). Bangladesh economy to grow 7.8pc in FY20: UN,
New Age, 19 January. https://www.newagebd.net/article/96993/
O’Donnell, G.A. & Schmitter, P.C. (1986). Transitions from
Authoritarian Rule. Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain
Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ottaway, M. (2003). Democracy Challenged: The Rise of SemiAuthoritarianism. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for
Parvez, M.S. (2015). The press, national identity, and the Shahbagh
movement: A study of the contemporary politics of Bangladesh.
M.A. Thesis. Washington DC: The George Washington University.
Rahman, A.R. (2019). Road safety movement: A year on, protesters
still not acquitted, Dhaka Tribune, 29 July.
Riaz, A. (2015). Bangladesh’s Fracture: Political and Religious
Riaz, A. (2019a). Legislature as a tool of the hybrid regime: Bangladesh
experience, PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(2): 275-276.
Riaz, A. (2019b). Voting in a Hybrid Regime: Explaining the 2018
Bangladeshi Election. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
Robertson, G.B. (2011). The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes:
Managing Dissent in Post-Communist Russia. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Roy, A.D. (2018). Shahbag stolen? Third force dynamics and electoral
politics in Bangladesh, South Asia Research, 38(3Sup): 1S-24S.
Sawasdee, S.N. (2018). A tale of two hybrid regimes: A study of
cabinets and parliaments in Indonesia and Thailand, Japanese
Journal of Political Science, 19(2): 269-92.
Scharpf, F.W. (1997). Economic integration, democracy and the
welfare state, Journal of European Public Policy, 4(1): 18-36.
Scharpf, F.W. (2003). Problem-solving effectiveness and democratic
accountability in the EU, Working Paper 03/1. MPIfG working
Schedler, A. (2002). Elections without democracy: The menu of
manipulation, Journal of Democracy, 13(2): 36-50.
Schmidt, V.A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the european union
revisited: input, output and ‘throughput,’ Political Studies, 61(1): 2-
Schmotz, A. (2015). Vulnerability and compensation: Constructing an
index of co-optation in autocratic regimes, European Political
Science, 14(4): 439-457.
Sika, N. (2019). Repression, co-optation, and movement fragmentation
in authoritarian regimes: Evidence from the youth movement in
Egypt, Political Studies, 67(3): 676-692.
Sood, V. (2013, April 18). Bangladesh: A battle for its secular soul.
Tannenber, M., Bernhard, M., Gerschewski, J., Luhrmann, A. & von
Soest, C. (2019). Regime Legitimation Strategies (RLS) 1900 to
2018. The Varieties of Democracy Institute. https://www.vdem.net/media/filer_public/6d/b2/6db2ed44-5d1e-4591-bff8-
Teets, J.C. (2014). Civil Society under Authoritarianism: The China
Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Daily Star (2020a). DU student rape: Protests rage on, The Daily
Star, 8 January. https://www.thedailystar.net/frontpage/dhakauniversity-student-rape-protests-rage-on-1850965.
The Daily Star (2020b). March towards EC: Cops stop du protesters at
Shahbagh, The Daily Star, 15 January.
Uldanov, A., Jakubiak, Ł. & ait El Caid, H. (2019). Protest publics as
the ‘triggers’ of political changes in hybrid regimes: The cases of
Tunisia, Morocco, and Egypt. In N. Belyaeva, V. Albert & D.G.
Zaytsev (eds.), Protest Publics: Toward a New Concept of Mass
Civic Action. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 233-257.
USDS (2018). Bangladesh 2018 Human Rights Report. Country
Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2018. Bureau of Democracy,
Human Rights and Labor, United States Department of State.
Vladisavljević, N. (2014). Popular protest in authoritarian regimes:
evidence from communist and post-Communist states, Southeast
European and Black Sea Studies, 14(2): 139-157.
von Haldenwang, C. (2016). Measuring legitimacy: New trends, old
shortcomings? German Development Institute.
von Soest, C. & Grauvogel, J. (2015). How do non-democratic regimes
claim legitimacy? comparative insights from post-Soviet countries,
GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
von Soest, C. & Grauvogel, J. (2016). Comparing legitimation strategies
in post-Soviet countries. In M. Brusis, J. Ahrens & M. Wessel (eds.),
Politics and Legitimacy in Post-Soviet Eurasia. London: Palgrave
Macmillan, pp. 18-46.
von Soest, C. & Grauvogel, J. (2017). Identity, procedures and
performance: How authoritarian regimes legitimize their rule,
Contemporary Politics, 23(3): 287-305.
Weber, M., Roth, G. & Wittich, C. (1978). Economy and Society: An
Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California
Wheatley, J. & Zurcher, C. (2008). On the origin and consolidation of
hybrid regimes, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 4(1): 1-31.
Zakaria, F. (2007). The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at
Home and Abroad. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Ziauddin, M. (2019). Bangladesh booms in a sluggish world economy,
The Diplomat, 2 November. https://thediplomat.com/2019/11/
|Cover Price||Discount||Pay Only|