Journal Reference
Volume 5 | Number 1 | Online Early Version
Online Version: ISSN No: 2709-0590
Print Version: ISSN No: 2708-2490
Price: BDT: 750.00, USD: 25.00
Publish Date: 01, July 2024
Article:
Ario Bimo Utomo and Salsa Febiola Gading Widjaya
Reference
Aguirre, I. (1999). Making sense of paradiplomacy? An intertextual enquiry about a concept in search of a definition. Regional & Federal Studies, 9(1): 185-209.
Ali Mukti, T., Fathun, L. M., Muhammad, A., Sinambela, S. I.& Riyanto, S. (2021). Paradiplomacy Policies and Regional Autonomy in Indonesia and Korea. JURNAL HubunganInternasional, 9(2), 140–141. https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.v9i2.8931
Atkey, R.G. (1971). The role of the provinces in international affairs. International Journal,26(1): 249-273.
Barnett, M. (1990). High politics is low politics: The domestic and systemic sources of Israeli security policy, 1967–1977. World Politics, 42(4): 529-562.
Beres, L.R. (1972). Managing power in a changing world system: The challenge of new actors. International Relations, 4(6): 673-687.
Boesche, R. (2003). Kautilya's Arthasastra on war and diplomacy in ancient India. The Journal of Military History, 67(1): 9-37.
Cornago, N. (2010). On the normalisation of sub-state diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 5(1-2): 11-36.
Criekemans, D. (2020). Protodiplomacy: sub-state diplomacy and wannabe states. In: Baldacchino, G. & Wivel, A. eds.,Handbook on the Politics of Small States (pp. 395-410). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Duchacek, I.D., 1984. The international dimension of subnational self-government. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 14(4): 5-31.
Gonda, J. (1967). R. P. Kangle, The KauṭilīyaArthaśāstra. Part I: A critical edition with a glossary. Part II: An English translation with critical and explanatory notes. Part III: A study. Oriens, 20(1): 320-323.
Gress, F. (1996). Interstate cooperation and territorial representation in intermestic politics. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 26(1): 53-72.
Hocking, B. (1993). Localizing foreign policy. In: Hocking, B.Localizing Foreign Policy (pp. 8-30). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Hoffmann, S. (1970). International organisation and the international system. International Organisation, 24(3): 389-413.
Holsti, K.J. (1978). A new international politics? Diplomacy in complex interdependence. International Organisation, 32(2): 513-530.
Jha, P.C. (2014). Federalism, regionalism and states’ paradiplomacy in India. In: Lobo, L., Sahu, M.&Shah, J. eds., Federalism in India: Towards a Fresh Balance of Power(pp. 234-259). Jaipur: Rawat Publication
Kamiński, T. (2018). Paradiplomacy–discourse analysis and research conceptualisation. In:Paradiplomacy in Asia. Case Studies of China, India and Russia(pp.11-37). Łódz: WydawnictwoUniwersytetuŁódzkiego.
Kangle, R.P. (1997). The KautilīyaArthaśāstra: Sanskrit text with a glosary. Pt. 1 (Vol. 3). Motilal BanarsidassPubl..Keating, M.J. and Aldecoa, F., 1999. Paradiplomacy in action: the foreign relations of subnational governments. Frank Cass & Co.
Kuznetsov, A. (2014). Theory and Practice of Paradiplomacy: Subnational Governments in International Affairs. Routledge.
Lalande, G. (1973). Quebec and International Affairs. Quebec Society and Politics: Views from the Inside.McClelland and Stewart.
Lande, E.B. (1979). July. Quebec's International Personality. In The Fletcher Forum,3(2): 22-45.
Lecours, A. (2008). Political Issues of Paradiplomacy: Lessons fromthe Developed World. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations'Clingendael.'
Lequesne, C. & Paquin, S. (2017). Federalism, paradiplomacy and foreign policy: A case of mutual neglect. International negotiation, 22(2): 183-204.
Liu, T. & Song, Y. (2020). Chinese paradiplomacy: A theoretical review. SAGE Open, 10(1): 1-14.
Manggala, P. U. (2013). The Mandala Culture of Anarchy: The Pre-Colonial Southeast Asian International Society. Journal of ASEAN Studies, 1(1), 1-13.
Mark, J. J. (2012). World History Encyclopedia: Ancient India. [Online] Available at: https://www.worldhistory.org/india/[Accessed 29 January 2023].
Michelmann, H.J. (1988). Länder Paradiplomacy. German Politics & Society, pp.22-31.
Nass, K.O., 1989. The foreign and European policy of the German Länder. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 19(4): 165-184.
Nganje, F.I. (2013). Paradiplomacy: a comparative analysis of the international relations of South Africa’s Gauteng, Northwest and Western Cape Provinces. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
Nye, J.S. & Keohane, R.O. (1971). Transnational relations and world politics: An introduction. International Organisation, 25(3): 329-349.
Plubins, R. Q. (2013). World History Encyclopedia: Khmer Empire. [Online] Available at: https://www.worldhistory.org/Khmer_Empire/ [Accessed 29 January 2023]
Riker, W.H. (1964). Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown.
Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalisation: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. Global Modernities, 2(1): 25-44.
Rosenau, J.N. (1976). International studies in a transnational world. Millennium, 5(1): 1-20.
Roy, J.L. (1976). The French Fact in North America: Quebec-United States Relations. International Journal, 31(3): 470-487.
Sarkar, B.K. (1919). Hindu theory of international relations. American Political Science Review, 13(3): 400-414.
Scott, J.W. (1989). Transborder cooperation, regional initiatives, and sovereignty conflicts in Western Europe: the case of the upper Rhine Valley. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 19(1): 139-156.
Shaw, T.M. &Shaw, S.M. (1977). Sport as Transnational Politics: a Preliminary Analysis of Africa. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 1(2): 54-79.
Skjelsbaek, K. (1971). The growth of international nongovernmental organisation in the twentieth century. International Organisation, 25(3): 420-442.
Smith, P.J. &Cohn, T.H. (1990). Municipal and provincial paradiplomacy and intermestic relations: BC Cases. Canadian Political Science Association Paper, Victoria, 5.
Soldatos, P. (1990). An explanatory framework for the study of federated states as foreign-policy actors. In: Michelmann, H. J. & Soldatos, P. eds.,Federalism and International Relations: The Role of Subnational Units(pp.34-53). Oxford.
Strange, S. (1976). The study of transnational relations. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 52(3): 333-345.
Sunada, I. (1978). The transnational relations of citizens movement: An analysis of anti-nuclear power movements in western countries:Non-state actors in international relations. International Relations, 59: 81-107.
Sundelius, B. (1980). Coping with transnationalism in Northern Europe. West European Politics, 3(2): 219-229.
Surpi, N. K., Avalokitesvari, N. N. &Untara, I. M. (2020). Mandalatheory of Arthasastra and its implementation: Towards Indonesia's geopolitics and geostrategy. JurnalPenelitian Agama Hindu, 4(3): 179-190.
Surwandono, S.&Maksum, A. (2020). The architecture of paradiplomacy regime in Indonesia: A content analysis.Global: JurnalPolitikInternasional,22(1)77. DOI: 10.7454/global.v22i1.443
Wen, Y. (2014). Mandala and charisma: The federalist potentials in traditional Indonesian political culture. Pursuit-The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee, 5(1): 201-213.