Journal Reference
Volume 7 | Number 2 | Online Early Version
Online Version: ISSN No: 2708-2490
Print Version: ISSN No: 2709-0590
Price: BDT: 750.00, USD: 25.00
Publish Date: 15, March 2026
Article:
Ghazali Bello Abubakar
Reference
Acemoglu, D. & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Adeney, K. (2017). Federalism and Ethnic Conflict Regulation in India and Pakistan. Palgrave Macmillan.
Arora, B. (2017). Federalism in India: Origins and development. In S. Choudhry, M. Khosla, & P. B. Mehta (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution (pp. 45–63). Oxford University Press.
Banerjee, M. (2021). The politics of Hindu nationalism in contemporary India. Studies in Indian Politics, 9(2), 137–150.
Bardhan, P. (2010). Awakening Giants, Feet of Clay: Assessing The Economic Rise of China and India. Princeton University Press.
Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012
Chandra, K. (2004). Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge University Press.
Chatterjee, P. (2004). The Politics of the Governed. Columbia University Press.
Chhibber, P., & Kollman, K. (2004). The Formation of National Party Systems. Princeton University Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Yale University Press.
Desai, R. M. (2015). State capacity and development in India. World Development, 68, 1–10.
Diamond, L. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35.
Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2013). An Uncertain Glory: India and its Contradictions. Princeton University Press.
Election Commission of India. (2024). Statistical report on general elections. Government of India.
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press.
Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press.
Greene, K. F. (2007). Why Dominant Parties Lose. Cambridge University Press.
Guha, R. (2007). India after Gandhi: The History of the World’s Largest Democracy. HarperCollins.
Guruswamy, M., & Abraham, R. (2020). Federal tensions and political centralisation in India. India Review, 19(3), 245–267.
Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (2016). Dictators and democrats. Princeton University Press.
Hale, H. E. (2015). Patronal politics: Eurasian regime dynamics in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Heller, P. (2000). Degrees of democracy: Some comparative lessons from India. World Politics, 52(4), 484–519.
Jaffrelot, C. (2015). The Hindu nationalist movement and Indian politics. Penguin.
Jaffrelot, C. (2021). Majoritarian state and democratic decline in India. Contemporary South Asia, 29(3), 1–15.
Jayal, N. G. (2013). Citizenship and its discontents. Harvard University Press.
Kapur, D., & Vaishnav, M. (2018). Costs of democracy: Political finance in India. Oxford University Press.
Kohli, A. (2004). State-directed development. Cambridge University Press.
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. Crown.
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy. Yale University Press.
Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. R. (Eds.). (1995). Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Stanford University Press.
Manor, J. (1998). The political economy of democratic decentralization. World Bank.
Mazzuca, S. (2010). Access to power versus exercise of power: Reconceptualizing the quality of democracy in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development, 45(3), 334–357.
Mehta, P. B. (2020). The rise of majoritarianism and the challenges to Indian democracy. Journal of Democracy, 31(2), 48–62.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Free Press.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Pai, S. (2018). Everyday communalism. Oxford University Press.
Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the Market. Cambridge University Press.
Rao, M. G., & Singh, N. (2005). The Political Economy of Federalism in India. Oxford University Press.
Riker, W. H. (1964). Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Little, Brown.
Rodden, J. (2006). Hamilton’s Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism. Cambridge University Press.
Rudolph, L. I., & Rudolph, S. H. (1987). In pursuit of Lakshmi. University of Chicago Press.
Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems. Cambridge University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Shankar, S., & Rodrigues, V. (2011). The Indian Parliament. Oxford University Press.
Sharma, C. K. (2015). The federal approach to governance in India. Publius, 45(1), 26–47.
Sircar, N. (2020). Democratic norms and institutional change in India. India Review, 19(2), 135–156.
Sridharan, E. (2022). Electoral politics and party system transformation in India. Studies in Indian Politics, 10(1), 1–15.
Stepan, A. (1999). Federalism and democracy: Beyond the U.S. model. Journal of Democracy, 10(4), 19–34.
Stokes, S. C. (2005). Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 315–325.
Tillin, L. (2018). Indian Federalism. Oxford University Press.
Urbinati, N. (2019). Me the People: How Populism Transforms Democracy. Harvard University Press.
Varshney, A. (2003). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. Yale University Press.
Youngs, R. (2018). Civic activism unleashed: New hope or false dawn for democracy? Oxford University Press.